Monday, December 20, 2010

mutations

Mutations are rare (scientific fact). random, no improvements, no new information, except harmful, fatal, or neutral to species & off-spring.NO beneficial mution has ever been observered.Natural Selection is the elimination of harmful, worst and weak mutations.Mutations can only produce negative effects, natural selection removes negative effects. Evolution cannot succeed without mutations and cannot succeed with them.If mutations can't produce evolution, what do evoutionists have left? Sickle Cell Amemia is mutations resulting in damage passed to off-spring. Blood doesn't absorb enough food & O2.The person is less likely to get malaria, but 25% die of malaria, 25% got malaria.Average malaria deathsf normal people is 30%. No real beneficial mutation, and if then why the research for a cure? Mutation causes information loss, in the opposite direction for goo-to-you evolution, that requires new information.Mutations cause something terrible that destroy organisms in the 1st generation or soon after, they terminate the life process. Mutations produce 3 changes in genes or chromosomes:1. Alternations of DNA letter sequence in genes.2. Inversion, Translocation changes in chromosomes.3. Polploidy, haploidy: change in # of chromosomes.None for good. They say evolution is the result of natural selection + time workin on radom mutations.(Ruse 1973). Evolution requires million&million change, But if mutations are rare, scientists cannot be sure of mutations being true for evolution cause of they're rare and not observed.. Genetic Load: the increasing negative effects of mutation on living organisms, the defects are accumulating. "Handbook of Evolution", Ferrell. Ch 10, includes "28 reasons why mutations don't produce"."Refuting Evolution", Sarfati, Ch 5,10,11 "Mutations corrupt info already present" (Lind,2010,Science 330(6005):825-27"Mutations don't contribute anything positive" 1997,(Judaica Press, 143)"Model points all down hill", (Kimura, 1979, Nat Acad of Science. 76(7):3440-44)"Mutations absolutely guarantees .. loss of infomation" (Sanford, 2005, Ivon Press, 24)

Friday, November 19, 2010

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Monday, November 1, 2010

Friday, October 22, 2010

NO GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

Roger Revell, the scientist that started this "warning", before dying said he was wrong.

"Global Warming" is NOT a global crisis" (WEB LINK)
Bud Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change
“Global warming” is not a global crisis
We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,
Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;
Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;
Recognising that the causes and extent of recently-observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ‘consensus’ among climate experts are false;
Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing human suffering
Read more from link above

CATHOLIC TRADITIONS

Roman Catholic Traditions Beginningswhich none are in the Scriptures AD 310 prayers for the deadAD 375 veerate angelsAD 394 mass acceptedAD 431 worship of MaryAD 450 sprinkling of babiesAD 590 the papacyAD 593 doctrine of purgatoryAD 787 seven sacraments started (official 1439)AD 850 holy waterAD 857 popal infallibility suggestedAD 1090 saying the rosaryAD 1184 selling of indulgencesAD 1229 forbidden for any layman to read BibleAD 1414 the cup (wine) only for priestsAD 1546 Apocryphal official(The Apocryphal was never quoted by Jesus or the apostles.was not in the LXX. Josephus excluded it as being slipped in.Not found in any catalog of the OT canon until council of carthage, AD 397). AD 1709 tradition of kissing pope's feetAD 1865 immaculate conception

ATHEIST'S KIDS?

ATHEIST, THEIR RELIGION, BELIEVE THERE IS "NO GOD".IF THERE IS A GOD, THEIR DISBELIEF IS ALSO DENYING HIM (GOD). THE IDEA OF "NO GOD" IS AS OLD AS TIME FROM MEN TRYING TO DUCK THE JUDGMENT OF A GOD. PEOPLE THAT DENY JESUS (GOD) MEANS THEY DO NOTHAVE THE FATHER (GOD) EITHER. THEY ARE LEFT WITH THE god OF THIS WORLD. DO ATHEISTS WANT THE BEST FOR THEIR CHILDREN AND REALLY LOVE THEM?MOST WOULD SAY YES WITHOUT THINKING IT THROUGH. BUT WHAT OF THEIR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN IN THE FUTURE?IF THERE IS A GOD AND HIS LAWS STATE: TO DENY JESUS (GOD), HAS NOT THE FATHER (GOD)EITHER. ALSO, GOD WILL PUNISH THE CHILDREN FOR THE SINS OF THE FATHER TO THE3rd & 4th GENERATIONS (EXOD 20.3-5). IN OTHER WORDS THE CHILDREN OF THE ATHEIST WILL SUFFER(BE PUNISHED) BY GOD THE FATHER (another example of bad things happening to good people). DENYING GOD IS REBELLION (THE SAME AS WITCHCRAFT), (DEUT 18.10, 12.1-3,32, EZEK 13.6).BOTH REBELLION AND WITCHCRAFT ARE WARNINGS FROM GOD FOR OUR OWN GOOD.DENYING GOD PUTS 1,000,000 PEOPLE A DAY INTO HELL (JOHN 16.9). BUT, AGAIN, THE CHILDREN OF THE ATHEIST (NOT THE YOUNG WHO ARE INNOCENTTO A CERAIN AGE), THAT ARE GROWN? HAVE THEY BEEN RAISED AS ATHEISTS ORBY THE BIBLE (which is very doubtful), OR TAUGHT NONE OF THE TWO (again, very doubtful),OR TOLD TO MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICE WHEN OLD ENOUGH? AFTER LIVING WITH PARENT OR PARENTS THAT ARE ATHEIST FOR 18-20 TEARS,WHAT CHOICE DO YOU THINK THEY WILL MAKE? (of course there are exceptions)THE PARENT IS AN "AUTHORITY FIGURE" TO THE CHILD. WHAT THE PARENT SAYS ISWHAT THEY BELIEVE, AND TO A CHILD, IT'S THE TRUTH, CAUSE "my parents would lie to me". IF THERE IS A GOD, A JUDGMENT, AND HELL, THE ATHEIST WILL BE THERE, AND THEN,HIS KIDS, GRANDKIDS, AND PERHAPS GRANDKIDS WILL START SHOWING UP (if theychoose their parent's belief system, which, odds are, they will). DO YOU THINK THE KIDS WON'T BE ALITTLE BIT UPSET AT THEIR PARENTS? ALL THE KIDS WILL BE ASKING THEIR PARENTS, "why did you tell us there is no God,why did you lie to us?BEFORE CAUSING YOUR CHILDREN TO FALL INTO HELL FIRE, PROVE, BEYOND A DOUBT,THERE IS NO GOD, AND THAT EVOLUTION IS TRUE. EITHER CRAP OR GET OFF THE POT.IF YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING, IT'S BETTER TO MAYBE KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. INVENTING SO-CALLED "FACTS" FROM YOUR OPINIONS, SLOPPY RESEARCH, ANDPREJUDICED MINDS DO NOT COUNT AS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. ATHEISTS HAVE BEEN DECEIVED SO WELL THAT THEY CAN DECEIVE OTHERS VERY EASY (such as their chirdren). THE BIBLE CALLS ATHEISTS FOOLS.IN CLOSING, THINK ABOUT IT FOOLS.

DOGS EVOLVE

Man & Dog? 1. Can you start the day without caffeine of any kind?2. Can you stay healthy with diet or sleeping pills?3. Can you eat the same food for a daily meal continually and still enjoy it?4. Can you get through a year without boring anyone by telling them your problems?5. Can you deal with stress and tension without medical help or psychological advice?6. Can you sleep well without drugs?7. Can you relax without any alcoholic beverages?8. Can you treat all rich folks and poor folks exactly alike?9. Can you get over a whipping from your master, and be completely over it in less than 60min and not hold it against him?10. Can you take criticism and blame without resentment?11. Would you kill any of your babies simply because you didn't want to raise them?12. Would you "bite the hand of the master that feeds you"? Man must have several thousands of years of evo-lootion to go before he can reach the level of a DOG

FOSSILS

If rock layers need millions of years to form, how do we still find many well-preserved fossils in those rocks? Most dead animals decay quickly or are eaten by scavengers fairly quickly after death. But in the uniformitarianview the dead animal must lay there long enough undisturbed by scavengers and without decaying for sediment to build up around itto fossilize it. Even allowing for hypothetical conditions in which animals decayed less quickly, the amount of time for slowand gradual fossilization means that we should find very few or no well-preserved fossils. Local floods couldaccount for individual fossil beds, but not the BIG picture of all the sedimentary layers and well-preserved fossils aroundthe world. This gives us the impression of a global event, such as the world wide flood of Noah's day.

KJV Bible Correcting

Correcting the King James Authorized Bibleby anyone:1. causes infidelty2. causes confusion with believers3. it reinstates the roman catholic bible4. repudiates the Protestant Reformation5. causes division amoung believers6. demonstrates the correctors are apostate7. rejects the wisdom of God8. reject the verbal inspiration of Scripture9. are neo-orthodox in practice10. recommed corrupt versions11. have no final authority12. are modernistic to Biblical authority13. put Christian "scholarship" above the Bible14. deny that God has preserved His words forever15. deny God gave His people His words in the English language as He wanted No one can be a "recognized scholar" unless he attacks the 1611AV. Only the KJV Bible commands us to "study...the word of Truth",and "search the Scriptures". ALL other "bibles" have deleted this.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

NEO-DARWINIAN

How many have read the book:

"The Scientific Alternative to Neo-Darwinian Evolutionary Theory"

by A.E. Wilder-Smith