Monday, December 20, 2010
mutations
Mutations are rare (scientific fact). random, no improvements, no new information, except harmful, fatal, or neutral to species & off-spring.NO beneficial mution has ever been observered.Natural Selection is the elimination of harmful, worst and weak mutations.Mutations can only produce negative effects, natural selection removes negative effects. Evolution cannot succeed without mutations and cannot succeed with them.If mutations can't produce evolution, what do evoutionists have left? Sickle Cell Amemia is mutations resulting in damage passed to off-spring. Blood doesn't absorb enough food & O2.The person is less likely to get malaria, but 25% die of malaria, 25% got malaria.Average malaria deathsf normal people is 30%. No real beneficial mutation, and if then why the research for a cure? Mutation causes information loss, in the opposite direction for goo-to-you evolution, that requires new information.Mutations cause something terrible that destroy organisms in the 1st generation or soon after, they terminate the life process. Mutations produce 3 changes in genes or chromosomes:1. Alternations of DNA letter sequence in genes.2. Inversion, Translocation changes in chromosomes.3. Polploidy, haploidy: change in # of chromosomes.None for good. They say evolution is the result of natural selection + time workin on radom mutations.(Ruse 1973). Evolution requires million&million change, But if mutations are rare, scientists cannot be sure of mutations being true for evolution cause of they're rare and not observed.. Genetic Load: the increasing negative effects of mutation on living organisms, the defects are accumulating. "Handbook of Evolution", Ferrell. Ch 10, includes "28 reasons why mutations don't produce"."Refuting Evolution", Sarfati, Ch 5,10,11 "Mutations corrupt info already present" (Lind,2010,Science 330(6005):825-27"Mutations don't contribute anything positive" 1997,(Judaica Press, 143)"Model points all down hill", (Kimura, 1979, Nat Acad of Science. 76(7):3440-44)"Mutations absolutely guarantees .. loss of infomation" (Sanford, 2005, Ivon Press, 24)
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Friday, November 19, 2010
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Monday, November 1, 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
NO GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS
Roger Revell, the scientist that started this "warning", before dying said he was wrong.
"Global Warming" is NOT a global crisis" (WEB LINK)
Bud Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change
“Global warming” is not a global crisis
We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,
Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;
Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;
Recognising that the causes and extent of recently-observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ‘consensus’ among climate experts are false;
Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing human suffering
Read more from link above
"Global Warming" is NOT a global crisis" (WEB LINK)
Bud Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change
“Global warming” is not a global crisis
We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,
Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;
Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;
Recognising that the causes and extent of recently-observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ‘consensus’ among climate experts are false;
Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing human suffering
Read more from link above
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)